<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screengrab! &#187; Screengrab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screengrab.org/news/category/screengrab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screengrab.org</link>
	<description>It's a Firefox extension!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.96.1 pending&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/06/screengrab-0961-pending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/06/screengrab-0961-pending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/06/screengrab-0961-pending/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A minor release to address the complaints of Screengrab 0.96 not working at all on pages with Flash or Java Applets!
This affects people with Java versions 6u10 &#038; 6u11 and is due to an issue Sun introduced with the release of the new Java Plugin. This is fixed in 6u12 and is therefore a highly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor release to address the complaints of Screengrab 0.96 not working at all on pages with Flash or Java Applets!</p>
<p>This affects people with Java versions 6u10 &#038; 6u11 and is due to an issue Sun introduced with the release of the new Java Plugin. This is fixed in 6u12 and is therefore a highly recommended Java update.</p>
<p>If Screengrab 0.96.1 detects either of these broken versions of Java it will play it safe and pretend that Java is disabled instead of silently failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/06/screengrab-0961-pending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.96 is cooked!</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/03/screengrab-096-is-cooked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/03/screengrab-096-is-cooked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/03/screengrab-096-is-cooked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can download it from addons.mozilla.org.
Please let me know any issues that you might have with functionality that doesn&#8217;t work anymore, or let me know stuff that DOES work now.
Refer to my previous post for info about it.
Thanks!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can download it from <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1146">addons.mozilla.org</a>.</p>
<p>Please let me know any issues that you might have with functionality that doesn&#8217;t work anymore, or let me know stuff that DOES work now.</p>
<p>Refer to my <a href="http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/screengrab-096-is-so-close/">previous post</a> for info about it.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/03/screengrab-096-is-cooked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.96 is so close&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/screengrab-096-is-so-close/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/screengrab-096-is-so-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/screengrab-096-is-so-close/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s just pending AMO approval (as usual). As soon as its out, you should get an auto-update from them so please don&#8217;t ask me for it early!
This one doesn&#8217;t add too many new features &#8211; you&#8217;ll have to wait for the next release for that.
What I&#8217;ve done for 0.96 is completely gut the innards of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just pending AMO approval (as usual). As soon as its out, you should get an auto-update from them so please don&#8217;t ask me for it early!</p>
<p>This one doesn&#8217;t add too many new features &#8211; you&#8217;ll have to wait for the next release for that.<br />
What I&#8217;ve done for 0.96 is completely gut the innards of Screengrab and then present the old interface over the top. But in doing so, I&#8217;ve fixed some things&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Fixed in 0.92</strong>
<ul>
<li>Pages that didn&#8217;t capture in full, now should (unless they&#8217;re really long &#8211; still not fixed that)<br />
Flash and Java should always capture automatically now as long as you have Java installed.</li>
<li>You no longer need to pick Java or Canvas modes &#8211; Screengrab now does a grab with canvas and then fills in Flash and Applets by grabbing them in Java mode. It&#8217;s the best of both worlds and you don&#8217;t have to lift a finger.</li>
<li>Copying to the clipboard should now be MUCH more reliable. Pasting from it should also be significantly more successful and work in all programs (I hope).</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s now a few options available in about:config for those who can&#8217;t wait for a release with real changes to the preferences panel. The ones people care about are&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>extensions.screengrab.useJavaIfAvailable</strong><br />
Set this to false if you never want to use Java. If you&#8217;re one of those people who hates it for some irrational reason then go nuts and turn off the most useful feature in this extension.</p>
<p><strong>extensions.screengrab.showIconInStatusBar</strong><br />
Set this to false to get rid of the icon in the status bar.</p>
<p><strong>extensions.screengrab.showInContextMenu </strong><br />
Set this to false to get rid of the menu in the right-click context menu.</p>
<p><strong>extensions.screengrab.jpgImageQuality</strong> default:75%<br />
Use this to specify a value for jpg quality. Up to 100 should work fine.</p>
<p>Very soon my pretties Screengrab will be awesome and I&#8217;ll retake the crown of most awesome web page capturing tool thing from those young upstarts who came on the scene later than me and did a good job!</p>
<p>Damn them all to hell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/screengrab-096-is-so-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Screengrab icon is under attack (competition ahead)!</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/the-screengrab-icon-is-under-attack-competition-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/the-screengrab-icon-is-under-attack-competition-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/the-screengrab-icon-is-under-attack-competition-ahead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just been reading the comments on AMO https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/reviews/display/1146?show=20&#038;page=2 and while the feedback is all lovely, it seems that people don&#8217;t like the icon!
I&#8217;m deeply hurt! I made that icon myself &#8211; I sweated over it for minutes as I took 3 images and stuck them on top of one another.
So I&#8217;ve decided to take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just been reading the comments on AMO <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/reviews/display/1146?show=20&#038;page=2">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/reviews/display/1146?show=20&#038;page=2</a> and while the feedback is all lovely, it seems that people don&#8217;t like the icon!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m deeply hurt! I made that icon myself &#8211; I sweated over it for minutes as I took 3 images and stuck them on top of one another.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve decided to take action!! SOMEONE MAKE ME A BETTER ONE!</p>
<p>Please! Feel free. If you make and I like it, I&#8217;ll use it, include it and cite you in the About box in the app and on the website. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t offer anything else as a reward. You&#8217;ll get kudos and the knowledge that your logo will appear in the browsers of somewhere between 250,000 (the number of active users I have) and 1.4 million (the number of downloads for this thing so far) people. You&#8217;ll obviously have to be giving me some sort of unlimited license to use it for promoting Screengrab or something, since that&#8217;s really the only tenable way this thing could work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also post all of the submissions on a page and maybe people could vote? I reserve the right to overrule you all though! Democracy in action!</p>
<p>So if anyone ever reads this website, and wants to do this, please make me a better logo! PLEASE!</p>
<p>I always liked the idea of a fist with a long web-page trailing out of it like ticker-tape, but I am (obviously) an idiot who (thankfully) can&#8217;t draw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/03/02/the-screengrab-icon-is-under-attack-competition-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary to popular opinion, Screengrab is very much alive&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/02/22/contrary-to-popular-opinion-screengrab-is-very-much-alive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/02/22/contrary-to-popular-opinion-screengrab-is-very-much-alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/02/22/contrary-to-popular-opinion-screengrab-is-very-much-alive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve received a few emails recently asking if Screengrab! is dead!
It isn&#8217;t, I promise. I&#8217;ve just been quite busy with other things.
There will be a new release in the next couple of weeks that will be functionally almost exactly the same as this one, but will have a completely renovated core. The original Screengrab was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve received a few emails recently asking if Screengrab! is dead!</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t, I promise. I&#8217;ve just been quite busy with other things.</p>
<p>There will be a new release in the next couple of weeks that will be functionally almost exactly the same as this one, but will have a completely renovated core. The original Screengrab was thrown together in 2004 and it was mostly guesswork at the time. Since then things have changed so it felt like a good time to improve the core functionality.</p>
<p>The new internals are much more easily extendable for all of the features that people have requested and will make it far easier to script using something like GreaseMonkey. </p>
<p>All (many of) those feature requests will get done once that release is out.</p>
<p>The future is good. Trust me&#8230;<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2009/02/22/contrary-to-popular-opinion-screengrab-is-very-much-alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.95 available.</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/06/04/screengrab-095-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/06/04/screengrab-095-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/06/04/screengrab-095-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And has been mentioned somewhere, the selection box is working again. Hooray!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And has been mentioned somewhere, the selection box is working again. Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/06/04/screengrab-095-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab source</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The source for Screengrab! is now more easily available.
Screengrab! is a GPL3 piece of code, just so you know.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source for Screengrab! is now <a href="http://code.google.com/p/screengrab/">more easily available.</a></p>
<p>Screengrab! is a GPL3 piece of code, just so you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.95 (pending addons.moz approval)</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-095-pending-addonsmoz-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-095-pending-addonsmoz-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-095-pending-addonsmoz-approval/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Screengrab 0.95 will be the FF3 compatible version.
It consists of a couple of tweaks to moz chrome changes that snuck in at the last minute.
All should be good soon.
I&#8217;m also working on a new release that should resolve a few of the long-standing complaints that people have with Screengrab! and will add some nifty new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screengrab 0.95 will be the FF3 compatible version.<br />
It consists of a couple of tweaks to moz chrome changes that snuck in at the last minute.<br />
All should be good soon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also working on a new release that should resolve a few of the long-standing complaints that people have with Screengrab! and will add some nifty new features.</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/screengrab/issues/list">Google Code issues page</a> for a list of what I&#8217;m working on for the new release.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t exhaustive, and none of it is guaranteed to happen by the next release.</p>
<p>The biggest changes going in are under the covers and involve using Java AND the Canvas to always accurately capture what is in the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/30/screengrab-095-pending-addonsmoz-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screengrab 0.94 (pending addons.moz approval)</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/12/screengrab-094-pending-addonsmoz-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/12/screengrab-094-pending-addonsmoz-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/12/screengrab-094-pending-addonsmoz-approval/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First a big apology! I know&#8230; I haven&#8217;t done anything on this in ages! The reason is mostly that I&#8217;m not that excited by Screengrab anymore. I&#8217;m working on DS development in my spare time, so this doesn&#8217;t grab me so much right now.
I embarked on a big code cleanup and rework expedition, which consumed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First a big apology! I know&#8230; I haven&#8217;t done anything on this in ages! The reason is mostly that I&#8217;m not that excited by Screengrab anymore. I&#8217;m working on DS development in my spare time, so this doesn&#8217;t grab me so much right now.</p>
<p>I embarked on a big code cleanup and rework expedition, which consumed my passion and tired me out, so I haven&#8217;t really looked at this in a while. I&#8217;ll get back to those little things that people want soon.</p>
<p>However, here is an increment of the version counter. Expect another one when Firefox 3.0 comes out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s currently waiting for approval, but it should be out there soon. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2008/05/12/screengrab-094-pending-addonsmoz-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best new features wouldn&#8217;t have been possible without&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2007/03/09/the-best-new-features-wouldnt-have-been-possible-without/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2007/03/09/the-best-new-features-wouldnt-have-been-possible-without/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screengrab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screengrab.org/news/2007/03/09/the-best-new-features-wouldnt-have-been-possible-without/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The selection tool was inspired by (and reverse-engineered from) MeasureIt one of the cleverest extensions available for Firefox by a chap called Kevin A. Freitas. His technique involves injecting a transparent div and some javascript into the page you want to measure (and that I want to grab). I never would&#8217;ve thought of that &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The selection tool</strong> was inspired by (and reverse-engineered from) <a href="http://www.kevinfreitas.net/extensions/measureit/">MeasureIt</a> one of the cleverest extensions available for Firefox by a chap called <a href="http://www.kevinfreitas.net/">Kevin A. Freitas</a>. His technique involves injecting a transparent div and some javascript into the page you want to measure (and that I want to grab). I never would&#8217;ve thought of that &#8211; it&#8217;s genius.</p>
<p><strong>The canvas grab</strong> is thanks to me stumbling on <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2005/05/rendering_web_p.html">this page</a> a couple of years ago and then waiting for the feature to be fully implemented in the browser. The motivation came from my main competitors <a href="http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/">Pearl Crescent Page Saver</a> (their grabber is pretty good &#8211; but you have to pay for the selection box). who had been previously capturing images using some very clever native libraries to do their work. I&#8217;m not that smart, so I was using the language I know: Java. My ego decided that I couldn&#8217;t lose the Firefox screengrabbing race so I got back to work. </p>
<p>(There&#8217;s also another extension called <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2703/">Snapper</a> that does this now. It&#8217;s good for quick shots.)</p>
<p><strong>The copy feature</strong> was inspired by all of the people who said they wanted it as a feature. You would not believe how hard it was to do. I&#8217;m not even doing it right, it&#8217;s a hack. I still don&#8217;t know how to put image data on the clipboard using the interfaces provided.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s how the hack works&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>I grab the page and get the dataUrl from the canvas.</li>
<li>I load the dataUrl into a hidden image in my extension chrome (it&#8217;s in the main overlay).</li>
<li>I then trick Firefox into thinking that the last thing the user clicked on in the browser was this image that they can&#8217;t possibly see (so that it thinks the context menu would be using it).</li>
<li>Then I invoke the command that drives the &#8220;Copy Image&#8221; context menu item.</li>
</ul>
<p>(There&#8217;s also a couple of timers in there while I wait for Firefox to get with the program)</p>
<p>If you think that&#8217;s hacky, one day I&#8217;ll explain how I get Java to take those shots and scroll the page. It&#8217;s CRAZY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screengrab.org/news/2007/03/09/the-best-new-features-wouldnt-have-been-possible-without/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
